At immoderate constituent during our caller Gilded Age, arsenic the United States and the satellite person go much unequal, did Prince Charming die? His cohort of have-yachts person made themselves recently and counterproductively disposable to our imaginations, posting connected societal media, sometimes utilizing their ain platforms, their glamor dissipating with each bid for laughs oregon likes. A pistillate successful privation of blue-chip phantasy fodder tin instrumentality her prime from a sickly harvest of tech tycoons—Elon Musk, for example, mightiness solicit her to carnivore 1 of his “legion” of children via I.V.F. Or possibly she’d similar to motion up for rank successful the bid wreck of the British Royal Family?
A spate of tv and books scrutinizing the 1 per cent attests to the trouble of romanticizing the pursuit of wealth, particularly erstwhile it is coupled with the pursuit of love. In the archetypal play of “The White Lotus,” a writer who marries a Master of the Universe benignant is promptly labelled a trophy wife. None of the Roys’ intimate relationships successful “Succession” bushed the charges of opportunism. (Indeed, the purest and astir passionate liaison connected that amusement develops betwixt Tom and Greg.) Morally compromised marriages of convenience are adjacent a crippled constituent successful the Star Wars spinoff “Andor”: successful bid to unafraid funds for her revolutionary organizing, Senator Mon Mothma indispensable brace disconnected her girl with the lad of a scheming magnate.
“Materialists,” a caller movie by Celine Song, is the latest lawsuit of this trend. The movie unfolds successful the satellite of high-end dating services and weddings that outgo hundreds of thousands of dollars. Lucy (Dakota Johnson) is simply a matchmaker for a boutique institution called Adore, wherever she fields demands from absurdly choosy and unrealistic clients, who are not seeking a transportation with different idiosyncratic truthful overmuch arsenic they are a decorator accessory. Their narration specifications are ludicrously precise: a antheral successful his forties wants a mature twenty-seven-year-old; different man’s explanation of “fit” is “nothing implicit 20 B.M.I.” and a woman’s slightest negotiable criterion is simply a high-six-figure wage astatine minimum.
Song’s demystification of what passes for emotion successful a emblematic rom-com is bracing. The genre often drapes its characters’ Wharton-esque crisp elbows successful gauzy layers of hetero-optimism. But dating, successful “Materialists,” is simply a gauntlet of “risk and pain,” and weddings are adjacent worse. (One of the film’s quiescent delights is its unsentimental portrayal of the indignities of this ritual: the Stepford bridesmaids, the dreadful unrecorded bands, the tulle, the sweat.) When 1 of Lucy’s clients admits, with mascara streaming down her cheeks, that the lone crushed she accepted her soon-to-be husband’s connection was to marque her sister jealous, Lucy nods understandingly—“he makes you consciousness valuable,” she affirms. Three-quarters of the mode done the movie, she yells, cathartically, “we are a SCAM!”
The movie’s satellite of endlessly customizable options provokes a hopeless perfectionism successful Lucy’s clients. Lucy, however, prides herself connected her deficiency of illusions astir love—until “Materialists” pushes Prince Charming into her path, astatine a shot (a wedding that Lucy facilitated). His sanction is Harry (Pedro Pascal), and helium indispensable beryllium a mythical creature, consecutive retired of a storybook: he’s practically made of paper. Lucy’s colleagues notation to men similar him—tall, handsome, successful finance, intelligent, urbane—as unicorns. When Lucy protests to Harry that he’s retired of her league, helium suavely enumerates her worldly and her intangible assets; past helium twirls her astir his twelve-million-dollar Tribeca penthouse.
At the aforesaid lawsuit astatine which Lucy meets Harry, she besides reconnects with an aged boyfriend, John (Chris Evans), an appealingly scruffy histrion and cater waiter whom Lucy dumped connected relationship of his fiscal struggles. Where Harry and Lucy prosecute successful sparkling bouts of banter, John and Lucy pass preverbally, done ardent stares. Song appears to beryllium recreating a dynamic from her début film, “Past Lives,” successful which a pistillate was caught betwixt her hubby (the comfy choice) and her puerility sweetheart (the heart-meltingly romanticist but profoundly impractical choice). In that movie, the heroine stayed with her spouse, but “Materialists” dreamily rewrites the script: successful a improvement that feels, alas, rushed and emotionally unconvincing, Lucy decides to beryllium with John. Harry incarnates a stressful perfection, the benignant that ever threatens to crumble oregon to uncover its counterfeit nature; John’s transportation to Lucy is that helium loves her, ever has loved her, and ever volition emotion her. He can’t assistance it. His emotion is similar a Netflix feed: it’s frictionless, it’s dependable, and it fits her exactly. In the end, the solution of the emotion triangle doesn’t evoke a triumph of chaotic passionateness implicit hard-nosed calculation. Rather, Lucy’s prime of John feels sneakily applicable successful its way—a reprieve from the hustle, the quest for materially remunerative emotion that lone ever feels similar work. Although a cosmically fated romance whitethorn good beryllium transcendent, what it truly has going for it turns retired to beryllium no-fuss dependability.
Song isn’t unsocial successful her tendency to amended a would-be Cinderella retired of her bourgeois striving. In Sean Baker’s “Anora,” which won 5 Oscars astatine the 2025 Academy Awards, a stripper named Ani falls for Ivan, a Russian failson with billionaire parents. After a whirlwind romance, the mates elopes, holing up successful sumptuous benignant astatine Ivan’s familial manse successful Brooklyn. When Ani’s champion person compares her to Cinderella, she laughs giddily, flush with the spoils of a consumerist American Dream. Soon afterward, Ivan’s parents unit him to annul the marriage, and it’s arsenic if Ani’s sable fur and Hervé Léger bandage gown person been turned to rags: He betrays his bride, who is punished with a bid of humiliations and abuses earlier she accepts a meagre payout successful instrumentality for disappearing from his life. The movie ends with Ani and 1 of the enforcers, the gentlemanly Igor (Yura Borisov), sharing an embrace, though their aboriginal unneurotic seems achingly tenuous.
Both “Materialists” and “Anora” question to uncouple emotion from materialism, but they spell astir it differently. In Song’s film, Lucy achieves the romanticist blessed ending without the money—once she discards her fixation connected idiosyncratic finance, she’s capable to admit her cater waiter’s bosom of gold. Ani, though, indispensable larn a harder lesson. She hasn’t transgressed successful wanting bully things oregon successful negotiating an economical statement with Ivan, but successful falling for the fairy tale. The metaphor of stripping is ne'er acold from our minds: Ani is exposed; she has fto down her guard. When Ivan takes her shopping, she spins unself-consciously successful beforehand of a full-length mirror, anxious to spot herself arsenic valuable. She’s foolish and starry-eyed capable to discontinue her job, and, later, to judge that a matrimony declaration could support her against the whims of the super-rich. If Lucy is censured for her coolly transactional attack to love, Ani is chastened for her innocence—for not being cynical enough.
It’s a motion of our unsettled times that neither of these films tin regenerate Cinderella with a compelling alternative. “Materialist” ’s attraction of its antheral leads renders Lucy’s determination internally incoherent. Because the movie doesn’t convincingly disavow materialism (at slightest arsenic embodied by Pascal), the main character’s prime to bash truthful feels didactic and contrived. The proposition is that Harry, who himself represents the apotheosis of box-ticking, operates successful a commercialized mode adjacent erstwhile he’s crooning astir Lucy’s “intangible” selling points. In bid to beryllium a existent disciple of love, Lucy needs to cull his superficial charms for John’s dependable presence. But the movie doesn’t efficaciously convey the mystical prime of Lucy’s enslaved to John, nor does it get crossed what, exactly, is truthful lightweight and inadequate astir her narration with Harry.
“Anora,” successful contrast, decisively punctures the Disney fantasy, but successful a mode that feels fatalistic and cruel. Everywhere successful the movie, money’s propulsion is stronger than that of love, friendship, backstage ethics, oregon societal justice. And though this could beryllium intended arsenic Marxist critique, it feels much similar creator convenience—the movie derives overmuch of its affectional powerfulness from its alleged capitalist realism, its assertion to spot the satellite done an utterly disenchanted lens. Instead of wishing distant worldly reality, “Anora” seems designed to unit its heroine to judge a cartoonishly blunt and brutal mentation of it. The movie tin abide mobster unit and the exploitation and acquisitiveness of its characters; what it can’t abide is Ani’s idealism. Tellingly, Baker predicates her infinitesimal of idiosyncratic growth—when she yet connects to Igor—on her resigning herself to her socioeconomic place.
And, though Song eschews Baker’s pessimism—she wrote a rom-com, aft all—she seals her movie with a akin gesture, conditioning Lucy’s storybook ending connected the quality mounting speech her hopes for societal mobility and taking up with John. A princess choosing a cash-strapped but virtuous suitor implicit a prince needn’t consciousness didactic. But “Materialists” and “Anora” are precise overmuch successful the concern of tendency didacticism. You tin archer due to the fact that the 2 films conflict to ideate however tendency mightiness determination erstwhile it is free. Both works are truthful consumed successful the symbolic attributes of their antheral leads that they neglect to capitalize connected their gravitational pull: nary quality played by Evans oregon Borisov should necessitate the affirmative enactment of people solidarity to look arsenic a convincing romanticist object. Nor should immoderate red-blooded heroine beryllium expected to driblet arsenic alluring a beingness arsenic Pascal. Love, successful these movies, emerges arsenic a virtuous vegetable. But the champion romances, whether drama oregon drama, marque a full repast of it. ♦
English (CA) · 
English (US) · 
Spanish (MX) ·