Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users

15 hours ago 4

The Supreme Court has agreed to determine the constitutionality of wide hunt warrants that cod the determination past of cellphone users to find radical adjacent transgression scenes

ByMARK SHERMAN Associated Press

January 16, 2026, 8:31 PM

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court agreed Friday to determine the constitutionality of wide hunt warrants that cod the determination past of cellphone users to find radical adjacent transgression scenes.

The lawsuit involves what is simply a known arsenic a “geofence warrant” that was served connected Google successful a constabulary hunt for a slope robber successful suburban Richmond, Virginia. Geofence warrants, an progressively fashionable investigative tool, question determination information connected each idiosyncratic wrong a circumstantial determination implicit a definite play of time.

Police utilized the accusation to apprehension Okello Chatrie successful the 2019 robbery of the Call Federal Credit Union successful Midlothian. Chatrie yet pleaded blameworthy and was sentenced to astir 12 years successful prison.

Chatrie's lawyers challenged the warrant arsenic a usurpation of his privateness due to the fact that it allowed authorities to stitchery the determination past of radical adjacent the slope without having immoderate grounds they had thing to bash with the robbery. Prosecutors argued that Chatrie had nary anticipation of privateness due to the fact that helium voluntarily opted into Google's Location History.

A national justice agreed that the hunt violated Chatrie's rights, but inactive allowed the grounds to beryllium utilized due to the fact that the serviceman who applied for the warrant reasonably believed helium was acting properly.

The national appeals tribunal successful Richmond upheld the condemnation successful a fractured ruling. In a abstracted case, the national appeals tribunal successful New Orleans ruled that geofence warrants interruption the Fourth Amendment's prohibition connected unreasonable searches.

The lawsuit is expected to beryllium argued aboriginal this year, either successful the outpouring oregon successful October, astatine the commencement of the court's adjacent term.

Sponsored Content by Taboola

Read Entire Article