It operates arsenic a exertion concern that builds full-stack infrastructure, including large-scale unreality platforms and developer tools, to work planetary workloads. It raised astir $4.3 cardinal done convertible notes successful March 2026 and signed a semipermanent infrastructure proviso statement with Meta, though it reported a nett income borderline of astir -110% for the 4th ended Dec. 31, 2025.
It provides a unreality level that offers scaling, support, and infrastructure for endeavor compute workloads, including virtual and bare metallic servers. It closed an $8.5 cardinal word indebtedness installation successful March 2026 to enactment its expansion, but faces securities fraud lawsuits alleging misrepresented lawsuit request alongside a nett income borderline of astir -29% for the 4th ended Dec. 31, 2025.
Revenue present refers to the information provider's standardized income-statement gross enactment item, and tracking it helps investors recognize the full magnitude of wealth a concern brings successful earlier immoderate expenses are deducted.
| Q1 2024 (March 2024) | $11.3 million | $188.7 million |
| Q2 2024 (June 2024) | $24.9 million | $395.4 million |
| Q3 2024 (Sept. 2024) | $43.3 million | $583.9 million |
| Q4 2024 (Dec. 2024) | $37.9 million | $747.4 million |
| Q1 2025 (March 2025) | $55.3 million | $981.6 million |
| Q2 2025 (June 2025) | $105.1 million | $1.2 billion |
| Q3 2025 (Sept. 2025) | $146.1 million | $1.4 billion |
| Q4 2025 (Dec. 2025) | $227.7 million | $1.6 billion |
Data source: Company filings.
Nebius and CoreWeave are some “neocloud” companies that supply unreality infrastructure specifically tailored for managing AI workloads.
However, some unreality stocks besides diverge successful definite respects. CoreWeave is much U.S.-centric and relies heavy connected a adjacent narration with Nvidia, which is simply a large investor. In contrast, Nebius is much heavy focused successful Europe and stands retired with a “global GPU fabric,” which links antithetic locations into a unified cluster.
Still, the differences whitethorn travel down to numbers. Both companies are absorbing sizeable losses, though CoreWeave has a overmuch greater request for extracurricular backing than Nebius, and its $21 cardinal successful indebtedness compares poorly to Nebius, who lone holds astir $4 cardinal successful debt.
Nonetheless, CoreWeave’s price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 7 is acold beneath that of Nebius, which trades for 62 times sales. This forces investors to take betwixt a comparatively inexpensive neocloud institution with dense obligations, oregon the overvalued institution with a little debt-heavy equilibrium sheet.

2 weeks ago
11




English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·