JONATHAN TURLEY: Virginia Democrats' map scheme faces judgment at the high court

As Virginia heads to the authorities Supreme Court, Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones (D) volition person to up his crippled a bit. For starters, helium volition person to really support the redistricting solution arsenic law erstwhile prompted. In a caller interrogation with CNN, adjacent the big of the affable web expressed vexation that Jones could not look to get himself to really support the dubious connection of the ballot measure.

Many of america person expressed skepticism implicit the process and connection of the solution that passed this week, efficaciously wiping retired each but 1 GOP territory successful the purple state.

Virginia was considered the golden modular among states rejecting gerrymandering with reasonably divided districts successful a authorities that is divided close down the middle. It past elected Governor Abigail Spanberger, who assured voters that she was adamantly against gerrymandering and past instantly called for the astir extremist gerrymandered representation successful the federation aft she was elected.

The campaigner who declared that "opposing gerrymandering should beryllium a bipartisan priority" rushed a solution to the voters that would person made Eldridge Gerry himself blush.

ERIC HOLDER ACCUSES GOP OF 'STEALING SEATS' WHILE DEFENDING 'FAIR' DEMOCRATIC REDISTRICTING PUSH

That representation passed by slim borderline arsenic Democrats moved to hitch retired the practice of fractional of their neighbors, leaving Republicans with conscionable 1 of eleven districts.

The occupation is that the Democrats were excessively clever by fractional successful crafting a run that adjacent the Washington Post declared arsenic shockingly dishonest and misleading for voters.

The deceit began with the connection of the solution itself. While Virginia instrumentality requires clarity successful specified resolutions, the connection was obtuse and vague, declaring that it would "temporarily follow caller legislature districts to reconstruct fairness successful the upcoming elections." There was thing "temporary" astir the plan, which would proceed for years. More importantly, it is unclear what is meant by "restore fairness" successful a representation that would hitch retired virtually each GOP district.

In addition, the process utilized to unreserved the solution to the ballot was abridged and unprecedented. This messiness was excessively overmuch for Tazewell Circuit Judge Jack Hurley who enjoined the representation approved by voters. It is present awaiting an oral statement earlier the Virginia Supreme Court adjacent week.

Jones was, of course, alert of each of this erstwhile helium received the astir predictable question from CNN big Brianna Keilar who quoted the misleading elements cited by Judge Hurley and asked "does helium person a constituent that it’s misleading?"

Jones went into an relationship of however the "yes broadside prevailed" and called Hurley "an activistic judge." Keilar reasonably followed up, noting "I cognize that you’re calling him an activistic judge, but helium is citing the Virginia Constitution and ineligible experts that we’ve spoken to accidental what he’s saying is going to make immoderate beauteous large challenges for you successful tribunal that you volition person to overcome." She past repeated the question.

SOROS-LINKED DARK MONEY NETWORK FUELS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH BACKED BY NATIONAL DEMOCRATS

Again, Jones had that cervid successful the headlights look and went into a babbling spin: "Well, look, I’m truly arrogant of Virginia. I judge the close to ballot is sacred, not conscionable arsenic Virginians, but arsenic Americans. This is the birthplace of democracy."

This speech went up until, to her large credit, Keilar ended the interrogation with "I don’t perceive you answering the substance of my question."

The occupation is that the run and the resolution, arsenic the Washington Post noted, is flagrantly misleading and dishonest. Jones relies connected the bulk connected the Supreme Court to motion distant the problems. Democrats are besides hoping that justices who person to look the voters themselves are improbable to negate a fashionable vote. Indeed, it does not look that specified a ballot has ever been overturned successful the state.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

If the Court stands with the instrumentality and throws retired the vote, Democrats could look the eventual disaster. They conscionable spent a luck to narrowly walk the resolution. In truthful doing, they alienated fractional of the state, who took it alternatively personally that Democrats were trying to hitch retired virtually each of their practice successful the authorities aft precocious promising ne'er to prosecute successful specified gerrymandering. They are not apt to hide this effort and virtually each Democrat successful the authorities fought to walk this resolution. Some of these Democrats person to trust connected Republican votes successful the purple authorities to unafraid statewide office. They are improbable to unit this effort into immoderate representation spread for the victims of the gerrymandering, peculiarly if the courts besides state that they were acting unlawfully.

Finally, the usage of unlawful means to gerrymander a authorities lone further destroys the credibility of the Democratic mantra of being defenders of the Constitution and democracy. The optics are lone going to beryllium magnified by an lawyer wide who was elected by Democratic voters aft threatening to termination governmental opponents and their children. There was nary vagueness successful Jones’ anterior attack to governmental opponents. His predetermination was viewed arsenic the eventual triumph of governmental rage by the precise aforesaid voters who conscionable efficaciously negated the practice of fractional of the state.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In the end, it volition beryllium up to the Virginia Supreme Court to "to reconstruct fairness successful the upcoming elections." There is nary question that this solution shredded authorities instrumentality and tradition.

The question is whether the justices themselves person the courageousness to request much from the Commonwealth of Virginia.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JONATHAN TURLEY