When “It Was Just an Accident,” a caller movie from the Iranian manager Jafar Panahi, won the Palme d’Or astatine the Cannes Film Festival, connected Saturday, Panahi responded successful a mode that I’ve ne'er seen from a winning filmmaker. As the assemblage wrong the Grand Théâtre Lumière erupted successful applause and leaped to their feet, Panahi, successful sunglasses, remained successful his spot and crowed his elation to the skies. And then, with a grin of contentment, helium folded his arms down his caput and leaned backward, arsenic if to bask successful the moment. Eventually, helium roseate and made his mode to the stage, wherever Juliette Binoche, the president of the contention jury, and Cate Blanchett waited to contiguous the award. No 1 seemed inclined to diminish the gravity of Panahi’s triumph by hurrying him along. His long, anguished, and improbable travel to that signifier merited much than a second’s reflection.
Panahi had past attended Cannes successful 2003, for the première of his 4th feature, “Crimson Gold,” a tense, downbeat play astir a pizza-delivery antheral successful Tehran pushed to a hopeless transgression act. The movie received beardown reviews and won a large prize astatine Cannes; it besides offered a stark appraisal of the Islamic Republic, and was, unsurprisingly, banned from being shown successful Iran. A akin destiny had met Panahi’s erstwhile film, “The Circle,” a trenchant critique of the mundane mistreatment of Iranian women, which won the apical prize astatine the Venice International Film Festival successful 2000. By the clip helium began making his adjacent film, “Offside,” successful 2005, Panahi was moving successful unfastened defiance of the government. A thrilling drama astir young women blocked from attending a shot lucifer successful Tehran, it was changeable without ministry permission. After it won an grant astatine the Berlin International Film Festival, successful 2006, it was banned successful Iran, though it was wide seen connected unlicensed DVD copies and became 1 of Panahi’s astir fashionable films.
In 2010, Iranian officials arrested Panahi and charged him with making anti-government propaganda; convicted, helium was sentenced to six years successful situation and fixed a twenty-year prohibition from making films. Neither punishment yet stuck. After a fewer months, the manager was moved to location arrest, and helium persisted successful making movies: “This Is Not a Film” (2011), “Closed Curtain” (2014), “Taxi” (2015), “3 Faces” (2019), and “No Bears” (2022) were each changeable clandestinely. “This Is Not a Film” was changeable wholly wrong his home; “Taxi” was mostly filmed wrong a cab. In years to come, these 5 films volition beryllium studied and appreciated not lone arsenic models of cinematic stealth and resourcefulness but besides arsenic a bid of wry, adjacent whimsical, self-portraits—a triumph of imaginative reflection nether duress. In astir of these movies, Panahi plays a manager named Jafar Panahi, who is sometimes watchful and reticent, and sometimes vocally philosophical, openly interrogating the circumstances of his confinement. When I encountered these films astatine festivals, it was ever a pleasure, and a comfort, to spot their manager onscreen, due to the fact that helium had besides been banned from leaving Iran. It became customary, arsenic a symbolic motion of solidarity, for festival organizers to permission a spot bare for Panahi, with a placard bearing his name.
There was nary specified bare spot astatine Cannes this year. Panahi, nary longer forbidden to travel, attended the première of “It Was Just an Accident,” a week ago, and helium stayed successful municipality done the closing ceremony, 4 days later. (He flew home, to Tehran, connected Monday, without incident, and was greeted astatine the airdrome by cheering supporters.) His carnal beingness earlier adoring Cannes crowds—to accidental thing of winning possibly the astir prestigious grant successful satellite cinema—was a stunning turnaround for a filmmaker who, conscionable a fewer years earlier, had been languishing successful Iran’s notorious Evin Prison. He was sent determination successful 2022, aft the authorities decided that helium should service his 2010 situation condemnation aft all. In February, 2023, Panahi protested his incarceration by opening a hunger strike, which galore feared would extremity successful his death. Instead, forty-eight hours later, helium was released—and freed, connected his ain brilliant, uncompromising terms, to marque movies erstwhile more.
“It Was Just an Accident” is the archetypal movie Panahi has directed since his release, and to accidental that it feels similar a genuinely liberated portion of filmmaking seems some evident and necessary: it’s the enactment of an creator who, having been to hellhole and back, has intelligibly tally retired of proverbial fucks to give. Panahi, notably, does not look connected camera, possibly due to the fact that it would person been redundant; his presence—and his experiences of detainment, imprisonment, interrogation—are stamped into each frame, and they confer connected the movie an implacable motivation authority. The communicative begins with the mishap of the title: a antheral named Eghbal (Ebrahim Azizi), driving location with his woman and young girl astatine night, fatally strikes a canine with his car. The contiguous aftermath triggers the archetypal of respective shifts successful code and focus: suddenly, we are pursuing different character, Vahid (Vahid Mobasseri), who works astatine a store wherever Eghbal goes for help. Vahid was erstwhile imprisoned and tortured for protesting for workers’ rights, and helium believes that helium recognizes Eghbal arsenic a acheronian fig from his clip successful prison, idiosyncratic helium has fantabulous crushed to privation dead.
But adjacent arsenic Vahid takes bold, drastic action—he knocks Eghbal out, ties him up, and stashes him successful the backmost of a van—he cannot beryllium wholly definite if helium has the close man. Before long, different survivors, each of whom stock some Vahid’s rage and his uncertainty, are drawn into the fray, and the van fills with an ever much unruly and bickersome quality cargo. Moving vehicles person framed the play of galore an Iranian art-house classical since Abbas Kiarostami’s “Taste of Cherry”—incidentally, the past movie from that state to triumph the Palme, successful 1997—but fewer of them person shifted into specified precocious melodramatic gear, oregon careened truthful determinedly betwixt thriller and farce.
Although Panahi changeable “It Was Just an Accident” successful secret, the obliquity and circumspection of his methods successful different caller films are small successful grounds here. More than immoderate of his films since “Crimson Gold,” “It Was Just an Accident” has the urgency of a thriller, albeit 1 successful which suspense is, for a while, predicated connected indecision. It is, bluntly and unabashedly, rip-roaring entertainment, propelled by flurries of comedy, bursts of emotion, and sidelong jolts of societal critique. One adust moving gag finds mediocre Vahid called connected to bribe workers, from information guards to infirmary nurses: each cynical participants successful a strategy that ne'er stops exacting a toll, large oregon small, 1 mode oregon another.
At the bosom of the movie are idiosyncratic memories of the unspeakable, life-altering agony that Vahid and his companions suffered—experiences that, successful airy of Panahi’s ain persecution, instrumentality connected a devastating idiosyncratic significance. In immoderate of the films that helium made betwixt 2011 and 2022, Panahi embraced a sly intelligence gamesmanship, evincing a curiosity and playfulness that pushed against the boundaries of cinematic form, and our perceptions of fabrication and reality. In the astonishing “No Bears,” helium seemed to explicit a pessimism astir the cinematic mean itself, and questioned whether the movies, truthful prone to manipulate and mislead, had exhausted their quality to archer the truth.
“It Was Just an Accident,” by bracing contrast, has nary involvement successful speaking successful code: this is Panahi astatine his astir direct, his astir engrossing, and his astir furiously political. Cinema, manipulative oregon not, inactive has its uses, and Panahi summons each the medium’s expressive powers to present a fierce, unambiguous denunciation of authoritarian regimes the satellite over. Startlingly, though, helium issues an adjacent graver informing to those who, fixed an accidental to nonstop immoderate tiny measurement of justice, would hesitate oregon suffer their nerve. Your tormentors volition amusement you nary mercy, helium seems to beryllium saying, and merit nary mercy successful return.
The show of Juliette Binoche embracing Jafar Panahi connected the Lumière signifier had a peculiar full-circle poignancy. In 2010, astatine a Cannes property league for Kiarostami’s “Certified Copy,” successful which Binoche starred, a writer had asked a question astir Panahi and the dire circumstances of his caller imprisonment, and she had wept openly successful response. Her show of emotion made headlines; truthful did her quality astatine the festival’s closing ceremonial days later, when, accepting the Best Actress grant for “Certified Copy,” she held up Panahi’s nameplate astatine the podium and called for his release.
Binoche spoke retired again astatine this year’s opening ceremony, wherever she delivered a sombre tribute to Fatma Hassona, a twenty-five-year-old Palestinian photojournalist who was killed, on with 10 members of her family, by an Israeli aerial onslaught successful Gaza connected April 16th. Hassona is the cardinal taxable of “Put Your Soul connected Your Hand and Walk,” a haunting documentary from the Iranian manager Sepideh Farsi, which premièred successful acid, a sidebar program. Hassona died the time aft it was announced that the movie would beryllium astatine Cannes. “Fatma should person been with america tonight,” Binoche said. Later, astatine the film’s archetypal screening, Farsi said that Israeli forces had deliberately targeted Hassona successful the attack. (The Israel Defence Forces has said that a Hamas operative was the target.)
In the film, Hassona says, with shattering calm, that she expects to beryllium killed soon, and that she tin lone anticipation her decease volition person meaning and impact. That explains some her information successful Farsi’s movie and the risks she takes successful her work, continuing to sprout photographs of the decease and devastation astir her. Farsi includes respective of those images successful the film, which is different mostly structured astir a bid of video conversations with Hassona, which Farsi began filming successful April, 2024. Hassona’s words are not casual to hear, not lone due to the fact that of the horrors and deprivations she describes but also, much literally, due to the fact that of the circumstances of the interviews. Her video and audio often chopped successful and out, a decent net transportation being 1 of galore things she has learned to bash without. She appears connected the surface of Farsi’s phone, portion Farsi shakily films the grounds with different phone. This method rawness serves a important purpose; arsenic the movie progresses, our region from Hassona becomes ever much evident and profound.
English (CA) · 
English (US) · 
Spanish (MX) ·