Disability-rights arguments grow heated at Supreme Court, though sweeping ruling appears unlikely

WASHINGTON (AP) — A disability-rights lawsuit astatine the Supreme Court grew unusually heated connected Monday, including accusations of lying and references to 1 side's presumption being a imaginable “five-alarm fire.”

The entreaty comes from a teenage miss with a uncommon signifier of epilepsy whose household says immoderate courts person made it excessively hard to writer nationalist schools that neglect to marque definite students get what they request to learn.

Her household appealed to the Supreme Court aft little courts blocked their favoritism lawsuit contempt findings that her Minnesota schoolhouse hadn’t done capable to accommodate her.

Their attorney, Roman Martinez, said the district’s presumption had shifted to a imaginable “five-alarm fire” for the disability-rights community.

Instead of defending the lower-court decisions that acceptable a antithetic ineligible modular to writer schools, they argued that each claims implicit accommodations for radical with disabilities should beryllium held to the higher aforesaid standard.

The schoolhouse district’s lawyer, Lisa Blatt, pushed backmost connected the thought that their arguments had changed. “They are adding words to our mouth. We ne'er said you should person a treble regime,” she said.

At the insistence of Justice Neil Gorsuch, she withdrew the allegation that the different broadside had lied but held steadfast to the contention that disability-rights claims should beryllium held to a higher ineligible standard.

The justices appeared skeptical of that argument, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett calling it a “sea change” and questioning whether immoderate little courts had adopted a akin view.

A determination successful the lawsuit is expected by the extremity of June.