CNN Panelist Calls AOC 'The American Nightmare' — But Abby Phillip Zings Him With 1 Point

“Shark Tank” capitalist Kevin O’Leary precocious referred to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez arsenic “the American nightmare” during a sheet treatment connected CNN that was centered connected the taxable of the American dream.

In a Friday conception of “NewsNight,” big Abby Phillip had asked O’Leary, a vocal protagonist of President Donald Trump’s policies, if the thought of Ocasio-Cortez perchance becoming the 2028 Democratic statesmanlike nominee acrophobic him — considering the progressive New York congresswoman is simply a “populist” who speaks to issues facing working-class people.

O’Leary said that portion helium has a “tremendous magnitude of respect” for Ocasio-Cortez, the president of the U.S. has to “embody the American dream.”

“People travel to America to execute the American dream,” helium said. “She embodies the American nightmare.” When pressed by Phillip to explicate further, O’Leary said: “Because [Ocasio-Cortez] doesn’t judge radical should win successful wealth.”

“This is simply a immense occupation for her,” helium said astir the typical who regularly speaks retired against the firm elite, the billionaire people and billionaire power successful politics.

The CNN big past argued that Ocasio-Cortez came from a “very humble background” arsenic a erstwhile waitress and bartender, and that galore would spot her communicative arsenic an embodiment of the American dream. But erstwhile O’Leary pushed back, saying that Ocasio-Cortez “does not enactment capitalism,” Phillip deed backmost with a important point: Everyone doesn’t presumption capitalism, oregon becoming highly wealthy, arsenic the pinnacle of the American dream.

“There are galore Americans who enactment truly hard and their aspiration is not to go supremely wealthy,” she said. “It is to person beardown household units, it is to person community, it is to person a consciousness of purpose, it is to lend to their environment.”

“There are galore Americans for whom conscionable being filthy affluent is not the American dream,” she continued.

“I privation to forgive you but you are making it hard,” O’Leary scoffed. He said earlier successful the speech that Phillip’s effect “tainted the American dream.”

But Phillip’s remarks resonated with galore radical online. Some radical connected X, formerly Twitter, called O’Leary’s remarks retired of touch, arguing thatcapitalist structures exploit working-class people, and that for galore radical surviving successful the U.S., the American imagination is not centered connected becoming ultra-wealthy.

The Pew Research Center defines the American imagination arsenic “the thought that anyone tin execute occurrence successful the United States done hard enactment and determination.”

But probe has shown that antithetic demographic factors whitethorn power whether radical successful the U.S. judge the American imagination is achievable.

According to a Pew survey conducted past year, astir 68% of Americans aged 65 and older said they thought the American imagination was inactive attainable, compared to 42% of radical nether 50 who thought so. The survey besides recovered that 64% of radical who earned higher incomes felt the American imagination was possible, portion lone 39% of lower-income Americans thought the same.

And portion lone 6% of Americans wide reported that they didn’t deliberation the American imagination was ever possible, the survey recovered that Black Americans were doubly arsenic apt to respond that mode than different radical groups.

Rutger Ceballos, adjunct prof of governmental subject astatine the University of Oregon College of Arts and Sciences, told HuffPost that helium believes it seems O’Leary was “suggesting that Americanism and capitalism are inseparable ideas.”

“While determination are galore Americans, past and present, who I americium definite would hold with him, determination is besides an arsenic salient American contented which is captious of concentrated wealthiness and economical inequality,” helium said.

Ceballos, whose probe explores the narration betwixt American governmental development, African American politics, and American governmental thought, pointed retired that fears that wealthiness inequality would “undermine the economical and governmental foundations of the republic” day backmost arsenic acold arsenic the Revolution.

And disapproval that the “ultra-rich permeated American governmental rhetoric” was seen during the Civil War and Reconstruction, America’s Second Founding, helium explained, adding that antithetic periods successful the U.S — including the New Deal, the Civil Rights Movement and the women’s liberation question — each “produced their ain criticisms of wealthiness inequality.”

“So, unless Mr. O’Leary is consenting to telephone 250 years of American disapproval of wealthiness inequality an ‘American nightmare,’ I suggest helium reconsider his critique,” Ceballos said.

Megan Hyska, adjunct prof successful the section of doctrine astatine Northwestern University Weinberg College of Arts & Sciences, said that she believes O’Leary’s remarks formed Ocasio-Cortez’s “social antiauthoritarian commitments arsenic contrary to immoderate humanities U.S. statement successful favour of debased taxation, debased societal spending and debased regulation” — but “that statement has ne'er truly existed.”

“The past of the U.S. labour movement, for instance, is 1 of moving radical who saw that their imagination of a beingness of dignity, prosperity, equality and state was 1 that not lone permitted but required limitations connected the quality of the precise affluent to further enrich themselves connected the backs of exploited labor,” she told HuffPost. “This is simply a imagination for which galore Americans person spent their beingness fighting.”

The American imagination doesn’t look the aforesaid for everyone. 

Sunyee Yoon, subordinate prof successful selling astatine the University astatine Buffalo School of Management whose probe includes societal presumption and mobility, said that it’s important to admit the American imagination “doesn’t mean the aforesaid happening for everyone.”

“People’s experiences with accidental and the obstacles they look tin alteration a batch depending connected their background,” she told HuffPost, pointing retired that for galore migrant families, for example, the American imagination mightiness beryllium astir “building a safer, much unchangeable beingness for their family, alternatively than simply accumulating wealth.”

“It mightiness mean being capable to entree bully education, unafraid employment and the state to explicit their taste individuality without fear,” she said.

Yoon besides said that for radical from historically marginalized radical groups — who’ve experienced long-standing systemic and intelligence barriers to scope “traditional markers of ‘success’” — the American imagination mightiness beryllium much centered astir achieving just attraction and adjacent opportunities.

And for radical who grew up successful low-income communities, the American imagination mightiness mean “being capable to spend assemblage without lifelong indebtedness oregon uncovering a unchangeable occupation that provides wellness care,” Yoon said, adding that radical from wealthier backgrounds mightiness instrumentality these things for granted.

Ceballos emphasized that the American dream, “broadly defined arsenic economical opportunity, people mobility and governmental and societal freedom,” was historically inaccessible to galore groups surviving successful the U.S., including women, Black people, Indigenous people, immigrants, LGBTQ+ radical and “at immoderate points successful history, impoverished working-class achromatic men.”

For galore Americans, the American imagination “may person little to bash with ‘success successful wealth’ and much to bash with basal dignity, state and information for them and their families,” helium said.

Everyone doesn’t payment arsenic from capitalist structures, experts say. 

There are “valid reasons wherefore immoderate radical knock capitalism, particularly erstwhile it comes to the attraction of working-class individuals,” Yoon said, citing instances of “unsafe moving conditions and debased wages” arsenic examples.

“At the aforesaid time, capitalism has besides been a operator of important economical growth, technological innovation, and improvements successful prime of beingness for many,” she said. “It has besides enabled ample numbers of radical to flight from poverty, created wide entree to goods and services, and encouraged entrepreneurial efforts that person shaped modern society.”

But Yoon said that portion she believes it’s important to admit that capitalism has “created galore opportunities,” not “everyone benefits arsenic from the system.”

“That’s wherefore ongoing discussions astir firm societal work are necessary,” she said.

Ceballos said that capitalism is “a hugely analyzable economic, societal and governmental system.”

“If the summation of profits is the sole metric by which capitalists justice ‘success,’ past galore people, particularly the workers whose labour produces the goods, hazard being sacrificed astatine the altar of amended quarterly returns,” helium said.

O’Leary’s comments connected CNN “reflect a acquainted strategy of claiming that the imagination of the wealthiest and astir almighty radical successful this state is everyone’s dream,” Hyska said.

She continued: “This is simply a sleight of manus that equates the wide imagination of worldly information with the elite imagination of unregulated wealthiness acquisition.”

Related...