Byju Raveendran, the embattled laminitis of Indian ed-tech elephantine Byju’s, has blasted a U.S. bankruptcy court’s bid directing him to wage much than $1.07 billion. He is denying wrongdoing, accusing lenders of misleading the court, and vowing to entreaty a ruling that marks a melodramatic autumn for a onetime poster lad of India’s startup boom.
The Delaware bankruptcy justice issued a default judgement aft uncovering that Raveendran had repeatedly ignored tribunal orders and provided “evasive, incomplete” responses regarding astir $533 cardinal that Byju’s U.S. portion allegedly transferred successful 2022 and ne'er recovered. The justice besides cited issues with a abstracted limited-partnership involvement aboriginal valued astatine astir $540.6 million. The ruling, dated November 20, stems from ineligible enactment by lenders seeking to claw backmost funds linked to the $1.2 cardinal word indebtedness they extended to the ed-tech startup successful 2021.
Earlier this year, successful April, a radical of U.S. lenders led by GLAS Trust sued Raveendran and his wife, Byju’s co-founder Divya Gokulnath, successful the Delaware bankruptcy tribunal implicit the missing $533 cardinal successful indebtedness proceeds. The mates denied wrongdoing astatine the clip and accused lenders of attempting a hostile takeover of the company. They aboriginal said they planned to prosecute a $2.5 cardinal suit against GLAS Trust and others successful India and different jurisdictions, though nary specified filing has publically surfaced. This was successful summation to the ailment Byju’s filed successful the New York Supreme Court challenging the acceleration of the word indebtedness successful 2023.
The court’s latest bid followed a September 29 proceeding connected the default request, wherever the justice cited a months-long signifier of noncompliance. The justice noted that Raveendran skipped hearings, missed extended deadlines, and ignored a anterior contempt bid imposing $10,000 successful regular sanctions that stay unpaid.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon said the alleviation granted successful the lawsuit was “extraordinary,” adding that “the circumstances of this lawsuit are, frankly, unsocial and dissimilar thing the undersigned has encountered before, thereby making specified relief… richly warranted.” The justice has fixed the parties 7 days to respond to the ruling.
“We see that the U.S. Court erred successful its judgement of this substance and volition beryllium filing the indispensable appeals and different contestations related to this judgement and related orders,” said J. Michael McNutt, elder litigation advisor astatine Lazareff Le Bars, representing Raveendran, successful a prepared connection to TechCrunch. “The court, successful our view, ignored applicable facts.”
Raveendran’s ineligible counsel argued that the tribunal issued the judgement without giving him an accidental to contiguous a defence and alternatively relied connected an earlier contempt order. The counsel besides argued that the ruling failed to admit that GLAS Trust was alert the Alpha indebtedness funds were not utilized for the idiosyncratic payment of Raveendran oregon different founders but alternatively for Think & Learn, the startup’s genitor company, the counsel said.

20 hours ago
2




English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·