Both the Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHO) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:BSV) purpose to supply low-cost, short-duration fixed-income exposure, appealing to investors seeking stableness and humble income. This examination looks astatine their fees, risk, makeup, and caller performance, helping item wherever their approaches to the short-term enslaved marketplace differ.
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of Feb. 7, 2026) | 0.74% | 1.68% |
| Dividend yield | 4.02% | 3.86% |
| Beta | 0.05 | 0.09 |
| AUM | $11.68 billion | $43.41 billion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
Both ETFs are among the astir affordable successful the enslaved space, charging conscionable 0.03% annually, but SCHO edges retired BSV by yield, portion BSV has the higher one-year return.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -5.73% | -8.55% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $947 | $951 |
BSV holds a premix of U.S. Treasuries and firm and investment-grade planetary bonds. It has 3,117 holdings, of which 73% are AAA-rated bonds, the highest standing offered. However, astir 12% is invested successful A and BBB-rated bonds, which are riskier.
Launched 15 years ago, SCHO is designed to way the short-term U.S. Treasury enslaved marketplace and holds 97 securities. All of the bonds held are U.S. authorities bonds, and mature wrong 1-3 years. Most of them are AA-rated, offering an highly debased accidental of indebtedness default.
For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.
Both bonds execute similarly, but what’s absorbing astir BSV is that, adjacent though its dividend output is lower, it pays retired much than SCHO due to the fact that its terms is much than 3 times higher.
It’s besides worthy noting that portion some ETFs are short-term, SCHO is much focused connected bonds that mature from 1-3 years, a shorter span than the 1-5 span BSV allows. This could mean that, connected average, the bonds successful SCHO’s holdings expire sooner, which would beryllium a payment for those looking for little volatility, arsenic short-term bonds are often much unchangeable than longer-term bonds due to the fact that they person little vulnerability to involvement complaint fluctuations.
Regardless, if investors are looking for much divers enslaved exposure, BSV has the edge, with implicit 200 times much holdings and a portfolio of bonds that spans crossed 4 antithetic complaint classes. But for greater stableness and little risk, SCHO is the much perfect option.

1 month ago
23




English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·